*Ahem*…politics
I’m not a very political guy. I think abortion is one of the most morally atrocious things a civilized society can engage in, and I think that we have a God-given responsibility to vote and to encourage our society to care for the poor and oppressed in the most effective way possible (which involves some serious thought as to what the wisest stewardship of finances is to care for the largest amount of the poor for the largest amount of time and sustainability). Besides that, I don’t have much to say, and to be honest, I’ve kind of prided myself on that.
Lately, though, I’ve watched politics be a serious divider in the Christian camp. With people writing books like “Jesus for President” (this isn’t a knock on the book since I haven’t read it, though I highly doubt that Jesus ever wanted to be president since he went out of his way to avoid any interaction with the political world), I feel like to be a good pastor I need to be able to speak in a thoughtful and biblical way about the topic.
All that to say, I thought this was a spot-on quote from Peggy Noonan’s column in the WSJ, and I thought I’d pass it on:
Democrats in the end speak most of, and seem to hold the most sympathy for, the beset-upon single mother without medical coverage for her children, and the soldier back from the war who needs more help with post-traumatic stress disorder. They express the most sympathy for the needy, the yearning, the marginalized and unwell. For those, in short, who need more help from the government, meaning from the government’s treasury, meaning the money got from taxpayers.
Who happen, also, to be a generally beset-upon group.
Democrats show little expressed sympathy for those who work to make the money the government taxes to help the beset-upon mother and the soldier and the kids. They express little sympathy for the middle-aged woman who owns a small dry cleaner and employs six people and is, actually, day to day, stressed and depressed from the burden of state, local and federal taxes, and regulations, and lawsuits, and meetings with the accountant, and complaints as to insufficient or incorrect efforts to meet guidelines regarding various employee/employer rules and regulations. At Republican conventions they express sympathy for this woman, as they do for those who are entrepreneurial, who start businesses and create jobs and build things. Republicans have, that is, sympathy for taxpayers. But they don’t dwell all that much, or show much expressed sympathy for, the sick mother with the uninsured kids, and the soldier with the shot nerves.
Neither party ever gets it quite right, the balance between the taxed and the needy, the suffering of one sort and the suffering of another. You might say that in this both parties are equally cold and equally warm, only to two different classes of citizens.
Here’s the full article. And a question I’ll be thinking about: where is the right balance, not just with expressed sympathy, but with actual help?
(HT: Justin Taylor)
